A fee model to maximize access
Get immediate access to licensed JSTOR archival journals and primary sources in a single collection—while spreading costs gradually over time.

A mission-driven model for sustainable access
JSTOR’s nonprofit mission is to expand and enhance access to knowledge and education for people all over the world. As a nonprofit, our policies and decisions aim to maximize impact, not revenue or profit.
This flexible fee model delivers on this mission by increasing access to content in a sustainable way for libraries, content providers, and JSTOR.

Highlights
- Immediate access to all licensed archival journals and primary sources
- Access begins at your current total annual fee, or a minimum starting fee that is 20% of the full fee
- Predictable annual fee adjustments (2-5%) based on classification
- Transparent pricing aligned with institutional size
- Opting for the fee model is non-binding and you can return to individual collections before reaching full fee
How it works
Institutions can opt in to receive immediate access to JSTOR’s Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection, a single collection of all licensed journal and primary source content. Your annual access fee (AAF) then increases gradually until it reaches the full classification-based rate. Visit our fees page for details on how the model works for both current JSTOR participants and new JSTOR participants.
What’s included
Opting in to the single collection provides immediate access to all archival journals and primary sources collections listed below:
Archival journal collections
- Arts & Sciences I-XV
- Business IV
- Hebrew Journals
- Ireland
- Life Sciences
- Lives of Literature
- Public Health
- Security Studies
- Sustainability
Primary source collections
Frequently asked questions
Why is JSTOR offering a full journals and primary sources model option?
Our mission is to expand and enhance access to knowledge and education for people all over the world. As a nonprofit organization, our aim is for our policies and decisions to maximize impact, not revenue or profit. Our full journals and primary sources fee model option is part of our efforts to deliver on this mission by increasing access to content in a sustainable way for JSTOR, libraries, and content providers.
More than 5,000 institutions have opted for full access to all archival journal and primary sources collections at no additional cost through our pandemic Expanded Access programs, and their students and faculty downloaded or viewed this content more than 95 million times. We were able to continue to provide consistent revenue sharing to our publisher partners who were also impacted by the pandemic and are essential to the work we do. Continuing that level of access is imperative to fulfilling our mission.
As we consider what we are learning from our experience in a changing environment and ask how we can best contribute, we have identified three areas of focus: making more content universally accessible, preserving at-risk materials, and improving the utility of all this knowledge.
Why did JSTOR choose this model to maximize access, rather than open access?
We evaluated many models, including Subscribe to Open, and determined they were not viable for a variety of reasons at this time. To develop this model we consulted our participants to validate whether the full journals and primary sources fee model is the right approach. Our fee model aligns with their feedback and our mission by:
- Eliminating the Archive Capital Fee (ACF) on new purchases effective April 1, 2023: Part of JSTOR’s non-profit mission is to support the long-term preservation of the content in our care. We established the ACF to provide resources so that JSTOR could fulfill that promise. We have retained and invested these funds for long-term growth, drawing on them only when needed for specific preservation activities like migrating content formats to keep apace with technology. Because of the significant support from the education community over the past 25+ years, and our careful investment of those resources, we have secured sufficient reserves to continue to preserve this content in the future.
- Making the model optional: Libraries may choose whether to opt in for immediate comprehensive access or continue with their existing collection-by-collection licenses.
- Providing a “slow and steady” approach: Institutions choosing the full journals and primary sources model will continue to have access to all of the journals and primary source content that they had with expanded access, but their annual fees will increase only modestly to cover JSTOR’s costs and to ensure that, over the long run, all institutions are contributing similarly to JSTOR’s long-term sustainability.
- Delivering greater impact: The full journals and primary sources model maximizes the amount of access and impact generated by JSTOR at current levels of revenue.
Can institutions opt-out of the full journals and primary sources model and return to the collection-by-collection fee model before they have reached full Annual Access Fee (AAF) for the collection?
Yes. The full journals and primary sources fee model option is non-binding and institutions can choose to return to the collection-by-collection fee model before reaching full AAF for the JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection.
Is there a limit on the number of years for institutions to reach the full Annual Access Fee (AAF) for JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection?
No. We did not want to impose a time limit on the number of years needed for institutions to reach the full AAF for the collection. Institutions eventually reach the same AAF for their respective classification, but the number of years to get there varies. This ensures institutions are comparably priced over time.
Why is JSTOR eliminating the one-time Archive Capital Fee (ACF) on new purchases now?
Part of JSTOR’s non-profit mission is to support the long-term preservation of the content in our care. We established the Archive Capital Fee (ACF) to provide resources so that JSTOR could fulfill that promise. We have retained and invested these funds for long-term growth, drawing on them only when needed for specific preservation activities like migrating content formats to keep apace with technology. Because of the significant support from the education community over the past 25+ years, and our careful investment of those resources, we have secured sufficient reserves to continue to preserve this content in the future.
Expand access with JSTOR’s archival journals and primary sources fee model
Get details on how this model gives your library instant access to JSTOR’s Archival Journals and Primary Source Collection—with equitable pricing and gradual, sustainable fees.
Note: Items marked with * are required.
Let’s expand access
Get instant access with the archival journals and primary sources fee model
Tell us a bit about your institution, and we’ll share how this model provides immediate access to JSTOR’s Archival Journal and Primary Source Collection—with flexible, sustainable pricing for the long haul.
Note: Items marked with * are required.